Plane Finder Client New Version! 3.3.222

Mark Daniels

Administrator
Staff member
Hi Chris,
I can see that your feed is working.
We'll just push out an update to the client on the BBB.
I'll send you the required info by email when done.
Cheers,
Mark
 
Last edited:

PerthWA

New Member
Hi, I have been sharing my data with FR24 for a long time now and thought I would share with PF. I run Windows XP but 3.3.222 displays a message on installation that XP is not supported. Is there a client I can use or is it a case of not being able to share with PF?
Thanks
 

Lee Armstrong

Administrator
Staff member
Hi, I have been sharing my data with FR24 for a long time now and thought I would share with PF. I run Windows XP but 3.3.222 displays a message on installation that XP is not supported. Is there a client I can use or is it a case of not being able to share with PF?
Thanks
Hello,

I'm afraid we don't support Windows XP.
 

MartinC

New Member
Lee,

In my log, I get a few of these errors scattered throughout the day ...

Failed to parse response from Plane Finder server: HTTP/1.1 502 Bad Gateway

...are they anything to worry about?

Martin
 

zahidulhasan

New Member
Dear lee,
I am getting twice AC status upload as well as twice bandwidth uses, its not necessary, but may i know how its gone double. Whats the improvements ?

upload_2016-2-28_20-30-26.png


Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan.
87952, 90005, 90018
 

Lee Armstrong

Administrator
Staff member
Dear lee,
I am getting twice AC status upload as well as twice bandwidth uses, its not necessary, but may i know how its gone double. Whats the improvements ?

View attachment 2464

Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan.
87952, 90005, 90018

Depending on what version you were on before there are a ton of improvements! We also extract some extra data from the Mode-S data that we didn't before
 

zahidulhasan

New Member
Depending on what version you were on before there are a ton of improvements! We also extract some extra data from the Mode-S data that we didn't before
Dear Lee, i am getting this error contentiously. Now going back to older version. No time to R&D on this issue. Previous version was absolutely fine.

upload_2016-2-29_8-54-45.png


Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan.
 

Lee Armstrong

Administrator
Staff member
Please do not downgrade. I think the errors are a coincidence. It appears whatever you are connecting to is refusing the connection!

We have over 750 already upgraded and working fine with a wide range of configurations.

Older versions will be blocked in the coming weeks.
 

zahidulhasan

New Member
Please do not downgrade. I think the errors are a coincidence. It appears whatever you are connecting to is refusing the connection!

We have over 750 already upgraded and working fine with a wide range of configurations.

Older versions will be blocked in the coming weeks.

Dear Lee,

Errors seems not to be coincidence. I updated another PF, that shows little different type errors.
upload_2016-2-29_13-0-9.png


Already downgraded 90 minutes before & its running smoothly without any error in 30003 port. As i know you don't wanted to run in that port. Yet its just a test configuration. And also i know in future older client will not remain active. Every updates comes to me as a R&D victim. So now i am happy with older one. When you will tell it will work fine, then i will update.

Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan.
 

Attachments

  • PF client old.txt
    48.5 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:

zahidulhasan

New Member
Dear Lee,

Both feed (87952, 91005) has been updated. Please keep an eye on it, if you think its required.

Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan.
 

zahidulhasan

New Member
Please do not downgrade. I think the errors are a coincidence. It appears whatever you are connecting to is refusing the connection!

We have over 750 already upgraded and working fine with a wide range of configurations.

Older versions will be blocked in the coming weeks.
Dear Lee,

Both feed having same type error & downtime in new client.

upload_2016-3-1_8-14-59.png


Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan
 

Lee Armstrong

Administrator
Staff member
Thank you.

I wonder if this is a low traffic time? If you click the link at the top of the log to enable verbose logging display you will see.
 

zahidulhasan

New Member
Thank you.

I wonder if this is a low traffic time? If you click the link at the top of the log to enable verbose logging display you will see.
Dear Lee,
I dont know which number is low traffic time ! Here is the hourly calculation of yesterday flight number. I got this data from FA, feeding from same dump1090.
upload_2016-3-1_11-34-34.png
upload_2016-3-1_11-35-57.png

When the problem started, that time it sent 156 packets in 5 seconds to PF server.
upload_2016-3-1_11-51-40.png

Thanks,
Zahidul Hasan.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-3-1_11-50-44.png
    upload_2016-3-1_11-50-44.png
    54.1 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:

Lee Armstrong

Administrator
Staff member
Those aren't related at all as are so far apart.

The old client had this exact behaviour too, Dump1090 sent us an empty response so we disconnected. It wouldn't let us reconnect at all for some time. Suggest you look at your Dump1090 code
 
Top